To grade or not to grade...
Grades are a funny animal at a school that purports to not have any. I believe I am revealing nothing new when I divulge that here, at NUSL, we have evaluations instead of grades. There are some pretty firmly entrenched ideas on the benefit/downside of evaluations, but before we get into them, it’s a good idea to understand what they actually are.
I was warned ahead of time that professors, in general, use buzz-words at the top of your evaluations that give future employers an idea of how you did in the class. While not a grade, per se, it does not take a genius to figure out the ranking scheme of: outstanding, excellent, very good, good, and so on… An eval starts with some variation of "You wrote a(n) ______ exam." or "Overall, your exam was ______." Fill in the blank with a buzz-word and you have a friendlier system of ranking than you would if professors used, say 3.8 or 2.7. Then, you get a few lines that tell you about your exam – in a way, it sounds like the perfect system: those that don’t want to be ranked can take solace in that they are not, but those that want an idea of where they are in relation to their peers can get a general clue. The system is very humane, as those at the very top or the very bottom don’t have to claw quite as hard, since there is no way to tell if you are number 2 or number 5 in the class, but you do have an idea whether you are in the top 10-15% or so. Of course, guessing, by definition is imprecise, and some professors muddy the issue by refusing to use certain buzz-words (much like that one Philosophy professor in undergrad who thought anything over a B+ had to be a monumental work comparable to that of Socrates -- yes, I am looking at you, Prof. Suits!), but overall the system provides enough granularity to keep those of us with scientific backgrounds happy.
The problem with an unconventional system is that no one else follows it. My biggest worry before coming here was how my transcript would stack up against my peers from other area schools. Imagine being an HR manager and getting fifty transcripts for a given position. You have an hour to whittle them down to the ones you will interview. Will you really take the time to read the transcript that has over twenty evaluations instead of one page of grades?
Thankfully, there are much brighter and better people worrying about this than just me -- and they have solutions. The first thing NUSL has going for it is its extensive co-op employer network. My sheepish apologies about the intricacies of how our "hiring process" works were met with nods of approval and understanding at every interview. The employers that work with NUSL know the system well, and they believe it works. Even more importantly, NUSL has started a slow, methodical shift to make it easier for graduates to get top employment opportunities. In addition to evaluations, upper-level students (starting with my class next year) will get a "grade-like object," as well. Ranging from High Honors, Honors and Pass to Marginal Pass and Fail, these will allow the university to produce a one-page transcript which will give an employer unfamiliar with the NUSL system a way to quickly determine an applicant’s worth. It’s still not a GPA, and it’s not a class rank, but it certainly alleviates some of my fears, and so I thought I would share.

